Clinical reference
Compulsive Document Ratification Syndrome (CDRS)
Ref: UT-CL-0034 · Reviewed annually · Next review pending
Overview
Compulsive Document Ratification Syndrome (CDRS) is a behavioural condition characterised by the persistent creation and distribution of formal agreements, declarations, statements, petitions, or covenants within one’s personal social circle, typically without prior indication that such documentation was wanted, needed, or discussed.
The condition is distinct from professional drafting (e.g. solicitors, HR departments), where documents are produced on request. In CDRS, the document precedes the demand.
Signs and symptoms
Presentations vary, but commonly include:
- Production of a formal document containing numbered articles or tenets
- Distribution of said document to friends, acquaintances, and colleagues
- A signature line, prominently placed
- Follow-up communications enquiring where the recipient “has landed” on the document
- Sincere surprise at low uptake
- Registration of a dedicated web domain
Onset and course
Onset is typically in mid-adulthood, often following a period of intense personal conviction. The condition tends to follow a self-limiting course: most cases resolve naturally within 18 to 36 months as social momentum dissipates. The domain registration frequently outlives the episode.
Differential diagnosis
CDRS should be distinguished from:
- Leadership
- Entrepreneurship
- Committee membership
- Residents’ association activity
- Genuine consensus
Impact on others
Family members, friends, and acquaintances of those with CDRS may experience Secondary Ratification Fatigue (SRF): a sense of weariness, mild dread, or social obligation arising from being asked to formally endorse the strongly held convictions of someone they know. SRF is more common than is generally acknowledged. If you are experiencing SRF, our support network is available.
Prognosis
Good.
With time, most individuals who have drafted an unsolicited covenant come to regard the episode with equanimity, and in some cases, fondness. The documents themselves are rarely revisited.
A note on terminology
The Trust uses “recipient” rather than “signatory,” as the overwhelming majority of those presented with such documents do not, in the end, sign.